
The Effectiveness of Profiling from a National Security Perspective
March 2009
by:
Jimmy Bourque, Ph.D.
Stefanie LeBlanc, M.A.
Anouk Utzschneider, M.Sc.
Christopher Wright, M.A.
The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Canadian Human Rights Commission or the Canadian Race Relations Foundation
This report is also available in .pdf format
Comments? Send us an email.
Researchers:
Jimmy Bourque
Stefanie Renee LeBlanc
Anouk Utzschneider
Christopher Wright
Guylaine Doucet
Samuel LeBlanc
Authors:
Jimmy Bourque
Stefanie Renee LeBlanc
Anouk Utzschneider
Christopher Wright
Science Editors:
Me Roseline Alric
Dr. Éric Beauregard
Me Judy Begley
Frédéric Diaz
Me Johanne Landry
Dr. Luc Morin
Me Thomas P. Walsh
Language Editors:
Katherine Pérusse
Coordinators:
Jimmy Bourque
Gaëtane Goguen
Table of Contents
Summary of the issue
Methodology framework
Behavioural profiling
Geographic profiling
Prospective profiling
Judgment in uncertainty
General conclusion
Recommendations
2.1 Research sources and criteria
2.1.1 Document origin
2.1.2 Year of document publication
2.1.3 Type of document
2.1.4 Language of publication2.2 Keywords
2.3 Document classification2.3.1 Subject treatment
2.3.2 Approach
2.3.3 Country
2.3.4 Profiling criteria
2.3.5 Type of intervention targeted
3.1 Background and definition
3.2 The practice of behavioural profiling3.2.1 Who are the profilers?
3.2.2 The practice of behavioural profiling
3.2.3 International use of profiling3.3.1 Homicides
3.3.2 Sex crimes
3.3.3 Arson
3.3.4 Terrorism3.4 Criticism of existing models
3.5 Empirical support3.5.1 General evaluations
3.5.2 Homicides
3.5.3 Sexual assault
3.5.4 Arson
3.5.5 Burglary3.6.1 Admissibility criteria
3.6.2 Profiling before the courts
3.6.3 Implications
4.1.1 Routine activity theory
4.1.2 Crime pattern theory
4.1.3 Rational choice theory4.2 Application
4.3 Empirical support4.3.1 Reduction of the search area
4.3.2 Accuracy
4.3.3 Heuristics versus software
4.3.4 Limits
5.1 Context
5.2 Definitions
5.3 Fundamental assumptions
5.4 Limits to the applicability of the actuarial model
5.5 General evaluation of the potential of prospective profiling
5.6 Empirical support5.6.1 Anti-drug trafficking effort
5.6.2 Fight against terrorism
5.6.3 Evaluation of recidivism risk
5.6.4 Prevention of school shootings
6.1 Definitions
6.2 The two cognitive systems
6.3 Cognitive biases
6.4 Application to the study of profiling