The job evaluation process measures the value of the work done within an organization or workplace. The purpose of this evaluation is to determine the relative value of each position or role. The evaluation is about the work itself, not its market value or the person in the position.
The job evaluation method must meet the following criteria:
All of these criteria must be met to ensure that factors associated with work generally performed by women are not overlooked or undervalued. Examples include:
Before starting the job evaluation process, it is important to gather enough information to understand the types of work done in different job classes. This information should be current, accurate and collected in a consistent manner. It must capture the skill, effort and responsibility normally required in the work, and the conditions under which it is performed. The information must relate to the position itself, not the performance or experience of the person holding it.
Types of information collected could include:
In some cases, the employer or pay equity committee may find the necessary information from existing materials. In other cases, they may want to source additional information to better understand the work, using, for example:
Using the chosen job evaluation method, the employer or pay equity committee assigns a value to each predominantly female and predominantly male job class based on the four factors (skill, effort, responsibility and working conditions). It then looks at the values of job classes relative to one another.
The point-factor method is the most common method used for valuing work for pay equity purposes. It involves assigning points to factors and sub-factors and adding them up to provide a “score” for the job class.
An employer or pay equity committee can use predetermined values of work in its pay equity plan if those values are current and have been determined using a single method that does not discriminate on the basis of gender and reflects the skill, effort, responsibility and working conditions. It is important to think about whether any biases may have been present when the values were determined and if so, to question them.